There is a
movie that came out in 1999 called “Romance”. In it a woman, Marie, is living
with a man who has no interest in sex. He tells her at one point that if she
wants to have a baby she should just ask him to “do his chores” and he will
have sex with her, but that is the only way. Her boss, the principle at her
Catholic school, is something of a libertine. He seduces her to come to his
place by hinting he is getting ready to fire her because she can’t spell. She
comes to his house and he brags that he has had 10,000 women. He talks
endlessly about his conquests and his prowess, and she is just bored. But it is
also obvious that he really wants her, and she is in need of being wanted.
He asks her if
she wants to be dominated and she agrees. He takes her into another room, ties
and gags her, not very artfully. In the French version of the movie (it’s the
director’s cut on NetFlix) the camera lingers on her face as she stands tied.
She begins to tear up and her boss checks in on her. He ungags her and she asks
to be let down, “Take me out of this.” He does so and carries her to the bed
where he lays her down. He asks what is wrong, if the bondage was not what she
wanted or if she really wants vanilla sex (which he calls “normal sex”). She
begins to cry and tells him it was okay, that she enjoyed herself. You can see
that she has just had the transformative moment that most of those who are into
alternative sexual practices have experienced at some point. Sensuous Sadie has
edited a book for Marie. It is called Spiritual Transformation through BDSM.
The book is
structured like a scholarly text book, with an opening essay by the author
illustrating what she has found, then a series of chapters from others in the
field which inspired the essay. What is different about this book from a
scholarly is that it is not about research or theories but about the personal
lives of the writers. Sadie has a huge pool of correspondents and is not afraid
to promote people whose writings have impressed her.
The book is
too large summarize completely here, so I will confine myself to Sadie’s essay.
Because Sadie has gotten her information from such a diverse group of writers her essay at the beginning of the book is very much the heart of the book. She
structures it around two ideas, Joseph Bean’s concepts around how one
approaches spirituality, “head first as the yogis do, body first as fakirs do,
heart first as monks do, or he may attempt the perilous task of going sexuality
first as in certain Tantric paths.” She uses this structure because of its
flexibility. She also uses Huxley’s concepts of the “Doors of Perception” which
posits that one can reach a godlike state through certain drugs. She quotes
Huxley’s definition,
To
be shaken out of the ruts of ordinary perception, to be shown for a few
timeless hours the outer and the inner world, not as they appear to an animal
obsessed with survival or to a human being obsessed with words and notions, but
as they are apprehended by, directly and unconditionally, by Mind at Large –
this is an experience of inestimable value to everyone and especially to the
intellectual.
After making
the connection between the doors of perception and BDSM she shows how people
approach this experience. She begins with what will be for more traditional
readers the hardest connection, the sexuality-first way.
What she means
by this is spiritual transformation which comes out of one’s sexuality. She
begins in what she calls “vanillaland” This is the sexuality of Tantric yoga or
Buddhism, Kundalini Yoga, which is also related to the Tantric writings and the
Kama Sutra. These approaches originated as a part of the Hindu tradition, which
emphasized sexuality as a way of life. These practices emphasized raw sexuality
as the way towards spiritual liberation. She also talks about Christianity in
the same context. I find the connection between the Christian debasement of the
flesh and BDSM, connecting them as a way of liberation the same as the Tantric
practices, a bit of a stretch. Christianity is about the withering of the
flesh, not the blossoming of the sexual experience. Still, many of the authors
in this book do and I cannot argue with their experiences.
Sadie makes
the connection between BDSM sexuality and spirituality by showing how some of
the experiences of BDSM are connected to other more traditional religious
experiences. She notes this:
One
of the main ones is an interconnectedness between self, partner, and god or the
universe. This is often experienced through an intense focus and awareness of
the present while simultaneously and paradoxically a disconnect with time and
space. There can be a feeling of freedom, and a breakdown of boundaries which
can feel which can feel to both the Submissive and the Dominant like a great
vulnerability.
For me that is
a pretty good description of what Zen practitioners call a “satori moment”, a
bit of spiritual liberation. Sadie hedges her bets here, there is, after all,
some controversy about this idea, but it is also the experience of many of the writers in this book.
The next
section is the “body-first” way. By this she is talking about the way of pain,
the ecstasy of pain and the art of body modification. Practices which produce a
lot of endorphins, including fisting, vaginal and anal. It is a way of
stimulating and modifying the flesh to be able to glimpse an eternity. The
connection with BDSM is pretty obvious. Endorphins are a god drug and pain,
even to the Christian Martyr pain is a pathway to ecstasy.
In the
following section Sadie talks about the mind-first way. It is the
intellectual’s way. In the BDSM sense it refers to dominance and submission. It
is the way of service and surrender, where the Submissive does things to please
his or her Dominant. She also puts prolonged bondage in this category and the
Dominant’s experience of walking meditation. BDSM as the martial art of
sexuality. Lastly, it is the way of ritual. Many couples who use Dominance and
Submission to express their relationship reinforce it with ritual.
Sadie next
describes the heart-first way, the way of love. At first this would seem to be
not related to BDSM, but one of the things one learns from Dominants in
particular is that there is a huge relationship between the love and trust that
one needs to be a dominant. Sadie quotes Joe Bean on how he loves anyone he
plays with, even if they are only acquaintances.
My experience
is that this is not something that is coincidental. BDSM play can create
emotions which, if they are not love, mimic it. There are some, of course, who
deny that what they do has anything to do with love, it is not my experience.
The next
section describes the Dominant as shaman. This is a pretty short leap in that
many shamanistic societies use physical pain or confinement to elicit the
peeling away of layers of illusion that shaman’s use to enter the spirit world.
I have known many Dominant’s who do this. Sadie talks to several of them about
the effects of particularly intense scenes. She talks about how someone who
sends a Submissive traveling is responsible to take the trip with him or her
and to have a pretty good idea of how it will effect them. Personally, I have
only done this coincidentally, but it is fascinating reading to find out how
others do it intentionally.
Lastly, she
speaks of using BDSM to heal. This is a complex topic. What the mortification
of the flesh can do is make one more aware of the flesh. It can help one
reclaim one’s flesh, as a story that Fakir Mustafa tells of a woman who had
been abused against her will so was having her genitals pierced so they could
become hers again. It can be a tool of grieving as Mistress Angelique Serpent
did by wearing a particularly uncomfortable corset to mourn her slave symbol,
because
I
needed to give my insides a physical reason for hurting so much…The endorphins
and the breathing restriction, as well as the meditative mindfulness of posture
that a corset necessitates, transported me to an altered state where grief was
easier to bear.
Sadie ends the
essay with two parts, one is about bringing God out of the dungeon, talking
about who when one does BDSM with all of these way in mind one can balance
one’s heart, body, mind and sexualit to achieve a kind of spiritual liberation.
The last section, Where We Go from Here is a call to take what we learn from
BDSM and take it out into the world. Submissive with service, Dominants with
leadership.
The rest of
the book is a series of articles and interviews with various authors. It is
divided into traditions which roughly fit the practices of the various authors
anthologized in the book, e.g. Eastern traditions or Earth Centered traditions.
I was rather pleasantly surprised to find that even the Judeo-Christian
tradition was represented by enough authors, particularly well by Chris M., to
be included.
I am one of
the authors represented in the book so I can give a description of how she
approached and structure our sections. Around the turn of the millennium I
wrote an essay. It connected BDSM with Zen meditation and the ecstatic
practices of other mystical spiritual practices. These are the first two
sentences of the book,
“A
few years ago I came across an article by Rick Umbaugh called “The Art of S/M”.
I was the first article on BDSM and spirituality I’d ever read, and I e-mailed
him immediately and struck up a friendship.”
After that she
asked me to be interviewed for her newsletter, the “Leatherpage”. She included
that interview, along with three questions that she asked every other author
who is included in the book. What is interesting, particularly about the three
questions is the eclectic nature of the responses. The only thing that I find
in common about them is the thoughtfulness with which these questions are
approached. I suppose this is normal for authors who are going to be
anthologized, but you can tell that these people have thought a great deal
about their sexual experiences and what they meant to them.
This has been
a great year for books on BDSM. This book and Sadomasochism: Powerful
Pleasures edited by Drs. Charles Moser and Peggy Kleinplatz has made great
leaps into helping move BDSM from simply a diagnosis of mental distress to
something that should be taken seriously by the scholarly and psychological
communities.