The Dominant's View, Dom's View, free bdsm ezine The Dominant's View, BDSM Ezine for dominants
Leather Law Panel
hosted by Master Conrad 
Vol 7 Issue 5

Home
Art
D.O.M.
Dom's Forum
Dungeon
Editorial
Erotica
Fact/Fiction
Feature Articles
Fetish Focus
Getting Started

Interview
Leather Law
Master D bate s
Mistress's Musings
Odds and Sods
Reviews
Sub Missives
Switch's Corner
With a Twist

TDV Bookstore
Search TDV
Support TDV

About us
Advertise at TDV
Archives
Links
Logo
Contributor
Guidelines


Work for TDV

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

My partner and I are both divorced with children. We try to be discreet about our Master/slave relationship around the children, they do notice things (my teenage daughter has asked some difficult questions). While I feel as if we can handle the children's questions and curiosity, I am wondering if our relationship gets back to either of our ex spouses, could they petition successfully on those grounds alone for changing custody?

Thank you,

rubia

Response from Master Kindred:

Age of the children, geographical location (i.e. - which State versus which Province), and the types of D/s behaviour witnessed by the children all play a role in providing a response.

Child welfare laws vary. For example, in Ontario ,Canada the courts take into account the 'best interests' of the child in custody matters to the degree of appointing legal representatives to speak for the children. My experience has been that the courts will seriously listen to the wishes of children ages twelve and older. That being the case, your adolescent daughter's perceptions will certainly weigh heavily.

As to your ex's petitioning the courts for custody on the basis of your D/s behavior, it is important to note that in most jurisdictions the court does not recognize adults consenting to physical beatings. The physical play of bdsm is therefore viewed as assault.

In my opinion as a kink-friendly therapist and former child welfare officer, sharing your D/s life with your children who are below the age of majority (adulthood) is placing yourself at risk.

Kindred

Response by slave Cat

slave Cat here .....

I've worked in family law (in the State of Nevada) for many years. My response is quite simple:

Anyone can, at any time, bring an action to change custody. In Nevada there must be a "reason" for a motion for change of custody. It is always an ideal situation when we do not have to defend WIITWD in any arena. It can get quite technical if we do have to defend it in a court of law. In my experience, a smart, level headed judge may not worry at all so long as folks aren't running around (or shall I say crawling around) naked, so long as there isn't SM activities going on involving the children, or in direct view of the children. Alas, not all judges are levelheaded or fair.

Master and I have dealt with this exact possibility as I have 2 teenaged children at home. We share custody with my ex. We are just very careful with our dynamic in front of the children. One of things that we do (that was actually started by my daughter) is that in their presence I refer to Master as "Mister Conrad." My daughter started that as a cute nickname for him, that showed some respect for his authority. It stuck. Yes, there are times I slip and call him Master in front of them, but they pay very little, if any, attention to the slips. This might be because “Mister” and “Master” sound so similar (and that was originally the case) but by now I am reasonably certain they have heard “Master” enough times they know what I am saying.

My advice is this: stay on good terms, so much as you are able, with the ex's; Keep everything such as toys and tools, out of sight, out of reach, of minor children; live your lives as you would but tempered with the idea that we don't need to involve other individuals non- consensually in our worlds/lives/dynamics, this involves our children. And last but certainly not least, if you have any legal issues that arise, and threats are made that someone may try to use your lifestyle against you, retain counsel immediately.

My Two Cents ~slave Cat Southwest slave, 2006 1.

Response by Master Conrad

I agree fully with what Master Kindred and my slave Cat have stated.

First, SM play is not considered psychologically "normal or legal in any state within the United States. I am less clear on other countries but my vague perception is that within the United Kingdom and Canada this is also the case. Be exceedingly careful in providing details of play to either your children or your ex's. If it comes up, "kinky sex" is about as far as I would let the description go. A better way to handle it is a simple "that is none of your business" or "I am not comfortable discussing such private details."

While Cat and I are very open regarding our relationship with our close friends, we also do not force it upon nonconsenting ears and if a minor cannot consent to sex (and legally and morally they typically cannot) then why would they be able to consent to receiving detailed information about someone else's sex life, including their parents. Discussions with young children about sex become fraught with peril when you get into detail, even when discussion simple vanilla sex. Further, while "the birds and the bees" might be a useful discussion in certain contexts, I fail to see the utility to a discussion regarding "the slaves and the whips" with anything other than a child who has reached adulthood.

Perhaps I am a bit strange however, as I have a strong feeling that nobody is really ready for SM play or heavy lifestyle related D/s until they are at least in their mid twenties. I am not really comfortable talking about Master/slave relationships, SM play or such with kids and am not usually willing to play with anyone unless they have demonstrated sufficient maturity, which usually manifests itself at around twenty-five years of age (or sometimes, regrettably, never). When I took Cat, I also took responsibility for her children, and I would never want someone in my care privy to information they are too young to positively absorb.

My basic advice is:

Do not use titles in front of the kids at first, do not use high protocol. Live your day to day life with your basic interactions in place, but do not share intimate details anymore than you would surf the net for porn with the kids looking over your shoulder, as the courts might very well look at it as the same thing. Eventually the basic interactions and D/s expectations in a 24/7 Master/slave relationship will become an accepted norm around your home and any slip ups or over sharing will have their damage minimized. Yet I would never, ever, share too many details, especially as it compromises deniability in a later court action. This all is especialy true for sex and SM toys and tools and lifestyle related books: keep them away from prying eyes as they will assuredly be viewed very dimly by a family court judge or someone with your local equivalent of Child Protective Services.

By way of a personal note:

I live a 24/7 Master/slave relationship with Cat and have had other lifestyle involved submissives who have stayed with us in the past; we also have her two teenaged children in the house, and an ex-husband to deal with. We might be in a somewhat unusual position given that I am a trial attorney who owns my own law firm, with the various strategic and finacial advantages that would confer in the event of a child custody dispute. However, I believe my actions at home would be no different were I in a different situation legally. When the children moved in with us full time it was to provide stability for them. Part of that stability was found in the obviously strong and structured relationship Cat and I share. I had no interest in hiding that relationship; it is good for them to see that dynamic and, anyway, I do not hide well or comfortably what I am or how I live. However, in terms of details we determined that if specific details " slipped" out it would be best if they did so after the kids were comfortable with the workings of the relationship. At that point it would be more of "yeah, makes sense, so what" rather than a salacious detail for gossip or shock. So while we did not change our basic interactions we forbore from use of titles or from in depth explanations. At this stage, about two years later, it is pretty much at the "yeah, makes sense, so what" stage and there is really little concern about it causing any grief any place. And, of course, if we ever had the grief, having never shared details, our response to any legal attack would be "prove it" which would be somewhat difficult to do in a court setting where the strict rules of evidence rather than the somewhat less structured rules of gossip apply.

Questions addressed to the panel are sent to me directly. I will evaluate the question for suitability as to which shall be addressed by the panel.
The questions I select will be then addressed by a panel member whose particular expertise suits them to provide an answer to the question. After that individual panel member crafts a response, any other panel member that desires to add an additional response will be allowed to attach an addendum. After this process is complete the question, answer and any addendum will be published.
Conrad
Contact me at: leatherlaw @ thedomsview.com
Disclaimer

By the very nature of this panel, any questions answered by the panel and any member of the panel cannot be considered as legal, accounting, medical, mental health and/or medical practitioner or professional advice of any sort. The Leather Law Panel, the individual members of the panel and the Dominant’s View do not endorse any particular answer as professional advice nor do any of the parties above accept any liability or responsibility for anything anyone might do or not do with any of the information provided. Rather the information provided by the panel should be simply considered as a starting point with which one can seek out qualified legal, medical or other professional advice provided by a working, trained and licensed professional knowledgeable in the laws and professional practices of the jurisdiction in which the inquirer lives and retained to deal with the inquirer's specific issue(s).