TDV: Welcome
Joseph. At the Distinguished Lecturer Series (DLS) in Winnipeg
in 2005, you announced that you were going to retire
from the BDSM lecture circuit. Why are you stepping back?
JB: My reason No. 1 is simple. I started teaching and lecturing
in the late 1970s. If I—and the others who were part of the
small circle of instructors who were at it in the 70s and 80s—have
done a good job, there should be lots of people taught and inspired
by our years of instruction. If so, they’ll be more in touch
with current realities and fully prepared to step into the lecterns
and onto the demo stages. If, after 28 years of doing the talking,
I have not spawned enough replacements for myself, then I should
have been fired a long time ago. There are other reasons, of course,
and one of those is Maui. I should add that I reached a point at
which I thought people were asking me to speak or teach over and
over at the same events and were missing out on the opportunity
to hear from some very interesting newer (and younger) people.
By cutting back, then stepping aside, I have opened those possibilities
up, and I think everyone will benefit. TDV: What
do you think is your contribution or legacy from the countless
numbers of lectures you’ve given?
JB: I
believe that there are many areas where I have had an important
contributing voice and I see those things as my legacy, although
I don’t expect to be remembered for them (either today or
in the future when I am completely out of the picture). The one
of these that matters most to me is consideration of the spiritual
content of SM lives. When I first wanted to talk about this publicly—at
the National Leather Association’s Living in Leather in 1988—I
was allowed to do it because I was the editor of Drummer magazine,
but I was told not to expect a crowd. “No one wants to think
about things like that,” I was told. In fact, it went wonderfully
and the crowd was huge. Since then, things have come to the point
that everyone who is producing a leather event is expected to accommodate
some discussion of the spiritual and dungeons are full of people
ritualizing scenes. I didn’t invent anything, I just kicked
off the public discussion within the leather communities. I believe
that I have made other contributions that will survive in the way
that a teacher’s work does, out in waves from mind to mind
and life to life.
Once, several years ago, someone else was asked who that Joseph
Bean is, and the inquirer didn’t know that I was sitting
right there at the table. So, the person who was asked gave an
answer that went something like this, “Joseph Bean is the
guy who puts things in perspective: Spirituality, edge play, leather
history, community involvement and mentoring. Listening to him,
people get permission to be themselves, and more. If you get a
chance to meet him, he’ll know how to fix what’s wrong
with you, too.” The guy who asked the question said, “I
don’t want to meet a guy who thinks of himself that way.” Of
course, as he walked away, we all got a good laugh, and I made
it my business not to meet him. I don’t think of myself in
the way portrayed in the answer, but I didn’t want to meet
a guy who thinks of anyone that way.
TDV: You’ve
written for, and edited, many of the most important BDSM-themed
magazines, as well as written books, both BDSM- and
non-BDSM-related. What drives you to write so prolifically?
JB: Interesting
question. Writing has been my passion since I was old enough to
figure out which end of the pen the writing comes
from. I didn’t intend to write about leather. I felt, when
Larry Townsend’s Leatherman’s Handbook came out, that
did it. No need for other books. That left news writing which didn’t
include leather stuff and porn which other people were handling
very nicely. But when I started teaching, it didn’t take
me long to realize that people always wanted more information,
more answers and, most important, they wanted the information to
be directed specifically to them and to address their specific
situation.
I kept the letters—mostly snail mail back then, some faxes,
even a couple of telegrams—and they became the basis for
my first book. That was put together first as columns for the S.F.
Sentinel (a newspaper where I worked at the time as an editor).
Then a book publisher wanted the information put together in book
form. She didn’t end up publishing the book, but once it
was written, largely as a way to stay awake at the bedside of my
dying slave boy, why not publish it.
While none of my leather and BDSM writing has made actual money
for me, I discovered that the need for information, or at least
the appetite for it, was pretty much endless. The leather nonfiction
all flows from that beginning. The fiction started when I converted
a story I had written for an arts magazine into a gay-leather romance
literally because it was faster to do that than to dig through
the slush piles and find a good story for Drummer. That was “Shadow
Across Time,” a story sort of about the driving of the Golden
Spike.
Everyone likes to be liked, no? Well, cranking out news and features,
reviews of books and the arts is nice. People like you for doing
it. But, if you’re circulating among leatherfolk, why not
write for them too and be liked by them.
I confess. That’s not an answer. But it is what your question
inspired.
TDV: You
were the founding Executive Director of the Leather Archives
and Museum (LA&M). What is the importance of LA&M?
JB: Any
community that does not maintain its history is not much of a community,
maybe isn’t a community at all. I think that
having the history available is what is essential. That, and a
willingness on the part of the public figures in the community
to tell the truth about the past. There is no requirement for everyone
to actually know the history. If it is saved and safe, all will
be well when it is needed. That’s not all that a community
needs, of course. It needs the history for which the LA&M is
the central repository. It needs current defenders like the various
task forces and advocacy groups. And it needs some preparation
for the future to always be in progress. That is what the teaching
and demonstrating and lecturing is about. Past, present and future
all have their places in defining the community each has its “consumers,” too.
TDV: Given
the devastation of the Leather community by AIDS, the important
of LA&M for that community is clear. But does the
non-leather community have an equal reason for supporting the LA&M?
JB: It
is my opinion that all the special-interest histories and museums
benefit everyone. The truth about the past has more and
more importance
as we discover more and more ways to be who we are, to be ourselves.
There may be no personal impact on me if the last Bengal tiger
in the world dies, or none that I am aware of, but I believe that
I share with everyone a responsibility to see that nothing human-sourced
causes that tiger breed’s extinction.
It might take thousands of words to weave that philosophy into
a fully and easily understood position, but I think the people
most ready to understand it will get it. Others may get it from
some other signal at a later time.
Everything that matters to anyone is of value to everyone because
the essence of being human is the sum total of all we are. If something
is true for a community as large as the world leather/BDSM community,
then that argument should be easy to rasp.
On a less philosophical level, the world should be interested
in the LA&M because we keep discovering kinkiness in the lives
of important historical figures. While that information is often
flushed out of collections at major universities and general interest
museums, the LA&M preserves it. The same can be said of American
Indians, Holocaust survivors, Gypsies…
TDV: What
ways can members of the BDSM, Kink and Leather communities support
LA&M?
JB: Obviously,
money is never a mistake, starting with the purchase of a simple,
annual membership. I believe the institution is safe,
but it is certainly not over-endowed. On the other hand, it is
even more important for people to collect what is worth saving
and deliver it to the LA&M. Remember that what is currently
of interest, however new, will be historic one day. The best way
to handle that is to send speeches, souvenirs, books, magazines,
event programs, photographs and whatever else comes to mind that
is in any way leather/BDSM related to the museum and to do it with
no strings attached. If the trained collection managers there determine
that an item need not be preserved or should only be preserved
as a copy or photograph, so be it. No strings attached. And, to
make the donation perfect, send along some money to offset the
cost of handling, managing and preserving the donated items.
On another level altogether, including the LA&M in your will
can be very, very important. At that point things you want to keep
near you to the end can be preserved. The LA&M can help you
do that the right way, to be sure your life and artifacts are understood
correctly. And, naturally, a will is another time to send money
or significant saleable items that can be turned into money.
TDV: You’ve seen a lot of change in BDSM over the course
of your involvement – from Old Guard leather to the contemporary
BDSM community. What do you think the biggest changes in BDSM have
been?
JB: Well,
I’d nit-pick about that Old Guard reference in
some settings, but I’ll take it as a generic reference to “once
upon a time.” That said, there is no doubt at all about the
biggest change. Most people might say the Internet or the spiritual
content, but no. Nothing compares with the effect of the massive
population increase in the publicly assessable community. It has
made super-events possible, kept publishers and equipment makers
and clothing manufacturers and retail stores in business. It is
the huge population that has made legal reforms possible and has
also invited some of the nasty attacks, the primary effects of
which have been a stronger bond within the community.
TDV: You
are an admired, even famous, figure in the BDSM community. What
do you think of your “fame”?
JB: My
first thought on that is that I would never have been such a solitary
and “famous” figure if not for the devastation
of the gay leather community by AIDS. Beyond that, the attention
has made it possible for me to get things done. That matters. I
couldn’t have started some of the magazines I did if I were
not “a name” in the community, and they were needed
at the time. I couldn’t have put the LA&M “on the
map.” I couldn’t have done a lot of things—some
of them important only to various clubs and organizations, some
of them known, others intentionally not known. So, being “famous” in
this way—as silly as it is—has been useful.
My most recent thought is quite different. I have noticed that
these few years of reduced circulation since I moved to Maui in
the October 2001 to January 2002 period (it takes a while to move
to the middle of the ocean), have been enough for huge portions
of the active community to be completely unaware of me. I like
that, a lot.
TDV: Being
a ‘celebrity’ many people in the BDSM,
Kink and Leather communities, look up to you. What kinky-folk do
you admire?
JB: Tony
DeBlase (publisher of Drummer when I was there) was a hero for
me in many ways, and Larry Townsend (author of so many
great books, starting with The Leatherman’s Handbook in 1972)
is one of the greatest human beings I’ve ever known. Taking
that down a notch, I find myself inclined to start listing artists
and writers before teachers and demonstrators. A couple of the
defendants in the Spanner Case in England go down in history for
me as endlessly admirable.
On the broader historic front, Lawrence of Arabia and King Edward
VIII, Verlaine and Rimbaud all make the grade.
On the most personal level, my three most-admired men are Paul
Martin, scott Smitherum and warren west. They earned my admiration
by putting up with me.
TDV: Many
of the lectures you have given have explored the links between
BDSM and spirituality. What is the link between BDSM and
spirituality?
JB: The
link is simple. We are human. One way of describing us involves
our being spiritual, mental, emotional and physical creatures.
If we start with that version of what a person is, then we have
to accept that the WHOLE definition is always true. So, we are
always spiritual, just as we are always physical. And, to make
the connection from there, all we have to do is recall that spirituality
is most experienced in the most intense moments of our lives. BDSM
is, for some, an opportunity for intensity.
TDV: Do
you think BDSM itself is inherently spiritual, or is it just that
humans are spiritual beings and therefore all that we
do has a spiritual aspect to it?
JB: Everything
done by a creature described as spiritual, mental, emotional and
physical also has inherent effects, contents and
elements that are spiritual, mental, emotional and physical. BDSM
is no more inherently spiritual than tea drinking or tango dancing.
But, when we speak of spirituality, we most commonly speak of “spiritual
experience” or “spiritual progress” of some sort,
or “spiritual vision/insight.” Some activities are
more likely than others to inspire or make way for these experiences,
instances of progress or insight. That’s where the intensity
comes into it.
TDV: The current political atmosphere in the States is very conservative.
What affect do you think this atmosphere will have on BDSM? How
do you think kinky folk should respond?
JB: Well,
perhaps surprisingly, as long as you don’t think
of the un-careful circulation of pornography kinky people have
actually done better under conservative governments than liberal
ones. Whether conservative governments and the officials who serve
in them despise the expression of kinkiness or don’t, I can’t
say. However, conservatives in general tend to have Big Issues.
In the areas of private acts and privacy rights, the only thing
they usually focus on is pornography. Once upon a time—at
least 15 years ago—Harper’s Index ran some items matching
liberal/conservative political views with lifestyles and activities.
In that list, asked whether SM was an acceptable alternative lifestyle,
three times as many conservatives (a majority) as liberals said “yes.”
Mind you, the conservative government in the U.S. will eventually
be very bad for all alternative lifestyles. When the debt is huge
and the reputation of the country in the world is weak, scapegoating
and distracting is called for—idiotic things like the war
on drugs, the protection of marriage, increased criminalization
of already “illegal” acts, etc.
More liberal governments make daily life more livable, but they
seldom have very beneficial effects (on a large scale) for people
who are considered different. The wins of blacks, Jews, gays and
others have consistently been irresistible and unstoppable creations
of the leaders within those communities, not gifts or effects of
government.
TDV: Any
final thoughts?
JB: One.
Recently, the most common question I am getting is about when
and how kinky people will gain “acceptance” or
be “mainstreamed.” I think this is a dangerous dream.
Instead of acceptance or mainstreaming, what we should all be praying
for and working with authorities to arrange is to be left alone.
There is no higher liberty than to be left alone, effectively ignored.
And it is a kind of liberty that comes with a lot fewer restrictions,
backlashes and losses than apparent acceptance. What’s more,
people who are left alone, become nearly invisible, no one cares
to know more about them. They don’t pry. Kids continue to
poke, but for adults, it’s live and let live.
TDV: Thank you for your time and your dedication to kink and kink
education. |