TDV: Hi
Gord. Thanks for taking time out of your busy schedule for
this interview. I’d
like to start by asking you a bit about your background. When
did you
discover your interest
in BDSM, and how did it manifest itself for you?
Gord: I was about five years old. I found that I was experiencing
very strange and pleasant feelings in the crotch area when I watched
the butt of a young woman actor dressed in net tights, calf boots
and a tight tunic jacket. She was playing a leading male part in
a kids pantomime. She kept turning to face the audience and hiding
her butt from view, and I can remember thinking it would be so nice
to tie her up so that she couldn't move and hide her butt.
TDV: Would you describe for us how you see yourself fitting
into the BDSM lifestyle? Are there elements of D/s in your personal
relationships? Is this a lifestyle for you?
Gord: Hmm! That is a difficult question. I don't actually see
myself as the typical, Dominant male, (whatever that is) and
I certainly don't live the 24 - 7 lifestyle. But I am told that
I do come over as a true dominant alpha male. I guess the true
test is how do the ladies perceive me. I've seen many wannabee
tops who the ladies just don't rate. As for D/s elements in my
personal relationship, I'm still working on that angle. Serena
is one helluva a tough lady, but then she keeps screwing with
my perceptions by going all submissive on me. It's that chick
thing; - keep um guessing!
TDV: Obviously you like tight and restrictive bondage, do you
consider yourself a sadist?
Gord: Not really. I am a sort of maverick. I have no doubt many
would see my super tight bondage as sadism, but that is not what
I am about. I am about gaining that illusory short lived control
over a woman, who I in fact consider to be very powerful adversaries
endowed with a whole series of dangerous weapons. Not the least
of which is a tongue that can kill a man at 50 yards with one
lash if they get pissed off. Personally I wish that I could take
all the stress and discomfort out of extreme bondage so that
I could keep the lady bound as long as I liked.
TDV: You have one of the most unique sites on the web, most
would describe it as extreme. Is the level of bondage you present
on your website similar to what you practice in your personal
life?
Gord: Not so much in personal life now as I am usually
super busy working to build new equipment and too tired to play
afterwards.
In addition, Serena, my wife has become the financial whiz kid
behind the website and she is just as busy as me these days,
and more often than not just as tired at the end of the day.
So I guess both of us get our play when working really. Almost
always the shoots are fun and there is plenty of laughing going
on, unless it is a really stressful high tech device that needs
my extreme concentration in order to maintain safety.
TDV: You create some of the most
amazing contraptions I’ve
ever seen. Where do the ideas come from? Do people challenge
you to create specific things (or to use specific things)?
Gord: Some do, but mostly they just come right out of
my warped brain. Often I think I'll never be able to come up
with something
new again, and then just when I figure I have lost it, a seemingly
innocent comment, or sight of something will trigger another
idea. I must admit, artists and other players have inspired me
as well. Notably the great bondage artists like Bob Bishop, John
Willie, Stanton etc. This instant idea event has become laughingly
known by all around me as "Gord having a rush of shit to
the brain again." Apparently a strange faraway look comes
over my face.
TDV: What
do you consider to be the most extreme piece of equipment
you’ve ever made yourself?
Gord: I suppose the fully molded garden roller must be the most
extreme from a ladies point of view. Being cast solid in an inescapable
tube of rigid foam with bearings around neck and ankles and being
spun around as I roll the lawn must come pretty close to human
limitations. Actually according to NASA figures, the rotation
speed was about half the rotational speed a human can stand for
short duration.
From an engineering point of view, probably the double borer.
(Bor 'o' matic) That was a tough one to get right. Potentially
it could be nasty in unskilled hands, no matter how many safety
devices I built in. The set up is an intense process of checking
and cross checking that requires the lady's total cooperation
and feedback before the machine is switched to auto bore mode.
During the set-up, the lady is required to keep a button in her
hand pressed. If she feels anything untoward, she releases the
button and the machine goes into auto retract on every station
and returns to the default position. It does this even if there
is a power failure.
TDV: What would you consider the most extreme piece of equipment
made by somebody
else?
Gord: I would think JG Leathers "Creature" That
device is total control and nothing less. I believe I am right
in saying
that it has taken him 20 years to reach the current level of
complexity.
TDV: Having so much equipment available to you, and being in
the enviable position to pretty much do anything you can think
of, is garden variety bondage boring now? (Garden variety meaning
the basics and not human sprinklers or lawn mowers!)
Gord: I would say yes. There are the odd occasions when low tech
bondage works for me, but normally that is only in a mainstream
film where there is also a good storyline as well. I guess both
the ladies that come here, and myself, are the types that get
off by driving for greater sexual expression and variety.
There is also the zany aspect. I mean, how many women can claim
to have had an orgasm whilst hogtied, mounted vertically on the
front of a truck, and being screwed senseless by a fucking machine.
It must be the ultimate 'beat that' storyline at a sex party.
I often try to imagine what it must feel like for these magical
adventurous ladies out there on the front of the truck. Of course
my turn on is that I can keep them out there and do what I want
for as long as I want, and there is nothing they can do about
it. It isn't about actually doing it; it is the fact that YOU
CAN, and that they know it.
TDV: Forniphilia,
the making of human furniture. You felt you needed to create
a word to describe
this area of expertise.
I’ve
always considered it objectification. Is it the same thing, just
more extreme? What is it about this form of bondage that draws
you to it?
Gord: I didn't actually create the word, my webmaster and friend
did. We needed a word to describe the phenomenon, and he came
up with that. It instantly struck a cord with me, and we adopted
it. Without doubt it is objectification. But it is also total
control. Finally, it displays the essence of womanhood,, her
curves, her shape, and the ability to allow herself to become
vulnerable, and at the same time know that she is utilizing every
ounce of her female power to pull the male in.. It’s a
Catch 22 situation. No one is really the top. It is power shared
at an incredible level.
TDV: I
read through your Forniphilia
FAQ and was impressed by the
care and consideration you present
in regards to submissives.
There is a school of thought out that says submissives are there
for the dominant’s pleasure period. How does that fit with
your personal philosophy?
Gord: In a word BULLSHIT! - At least in my world of bondage.
But then, as long as consensuality is present, I have no argument
with anyone else's style. Everyone to his own.
I derive my pleasure from generating pleasure in women. If they
don't enjoy it, it usually doesn't work for me because I can
sense that they are not enjoying it. I prefer to dominate by
taking control of a woman's incredible capacity for pleasure
and turning it back on them as a weapon. If the lady wants to
fantasize about being a pleasure object and nothing more, then
more power to her. If it works for her, she should go for it.
I can't think of submission and dominance any other way without
going into the deeper, darker reaches of my mind; a place where
I am not comfortable. I guess many out there fantasize about
having a secret island stocked with bound women who have no rights
or considerations at all; merely slaves to your every desire.
In reality, even if I had such a place, I couldn't go to that
level.
I am quite happy to be where I am and enjoy the level I am at
and leave the dark side as a whimsical semi-erotic thought.
TDV: Are the models that work with you experienced bondage models
only or do you get people contacting you simply to experience
your style of bondage?
Gord: It
is a mixture of friends, models who are friends, and models we
only just met. As a rule models nearly always become
our friends because we treat them right and they know they are
safe to enjoy their fantasies with us. As far as I know we have
never used a model who was not also turned on by bondage and
who was just doing it for money. Lately models tend to flock
to the House of Gord when they need some R & R. After a shoot
they pretty much get to be totally laid back and dragged into
the clan as family. In fact that is a good way of describing
our favourite ladies, they are thought of as family.
TDV: Do you have requirements of your models? Flexibility etc
or do you work around their abilities?
Gord: Generally we do a work up of all their capabilities, likes,
dislikes, no go areas, and what turns them on, before we will
consider using them. We also very much rely on model friends
we have, to advise (if they know) what the lady's capabilities
are. If you want to know about bondage models, you need to ask
bondage models. It is a veritable bondage model family who has
their own circle of trusted people, and thankfully we appear
to be in the circle of trusted people.
TDV: Do you ever have shoots that fall apart due to the model
not being able to handle the bondage you plan on using? What
kind of circumstances have you had to deal with in that regard?
Gord: Of course, but not that often, probably only two or three
times since the website started 8 or 9 years ago. Our biggest
problem when that happens is consoling the lady who feels she
failed you. But I would rather scrap a dozen shoots than hurt
one of these ladies or go beyond their limits because they were
ashamed to call it quits. Normally we explain to the model at
the outset that if we ever hear she was pushed too far and she
didn't tell us, she will never work for us again. It is one of
our strongest rules that they must give the safe word if they
feel it is too much.
We have had a couple who told us they were maxing out early,
and they were instantly released. But they were determined to
do the gig. So overnight I would redesign equipment so that they
could try again, and every time so far we have done the shoot
easily and without a problem.
These are super complex machines to design and match with each
lady, and it is very difficult to get it dead right on the first
try when the lady may have been a 1000 miles away until the first
try.
TDV: You’ve
worked with so many people (riggers, photographers and
models) you must have
volumes of good stories to tell. Would
you tell us one?
Gord: I would probably have to mention JG Leathers as
the foremost in my mind for crazy bondage adventures. There were
two crazy
years in Canada that we often think about. I was in exile basically.
The US Immigration considered I was a threat to the security
of the United States because of what I am. (I have that in writing)
I lived at John's house for over two years and gradually we built
up a following of safe bondage kinks and arranged some of the
most exciting bondage adventures you can imagine. It was basically
non stop bondage mayhem. It even included bondage in a plane
over Vancouver because we couldn't figure out how to do the scene
with special effects, so we did it for real.
One such memorable incident was when we hired two horse ladies
to wrangle the horses in a Blanche Maynard scene where two chicks
get captured in the woods, bound, and led back to camp by the
arch bitch on horse back. Neither was into bondage at that time.
So anyway, they came over to the house a few days later to look
over the photos and see if there were any they objected to. John
and I showed them around his dungeon and they seemed interested.
I'm not quite sure how it all happened or how we talked them
into it, but both these ladies ended up stripped down to their
underwear, hogtied side by side, fastened down to ringbolts in
the floor, both gagged with their hair pulled back and fastened
to their feet. Later they ended up in rubber suits, with high
heeled thigh boots, gags, the whole shooting match. One was bound
to the dildo saddle suspended from the ceiling and the other
connected to her, tormenting her.
So after we shot all
the film we wanted, they got dressed and left. John and I watched
them go and were looking at each other
in astonishment. It later transpired that the girls got just
around the corner and came to a screaming stop. One says to the
other "I can't believe what we just did."
Well, I got to play with one of them at a later date. She came
back with two friends and I ended up with three women on leashes,
arm sheathed, rubberized, booted, hobbled, hooded, gagged, and
wandering around downtown Vancouver looking for a club we had
been invited to do a show at.
At one point we were
having a problem crossing a busy road in Gas Town (Hastings
Street) because the girls couldn't run with
hobbles. Suddenly an RCMP cruiser pulled up in front of us. The
cop sort of slowly eyed the girls up and down, shook his head
in disbelief, then got out and stopped the traffic for us. I
guess he didn't want to argue with the one bound chick. She was
a super fit, gymnastic type gal who happened to be a Military
MP. She had a way of looking at people that said "You really
don't want to fuck with me unless I ask you to."
TDV: Recently a local television station aired a segment regarding
your concerns about plans for a property (next door or near)
to your home. Can you tell us a little about that?
Gord: I assume you mean the Nike missile site. A local school
authority is trying to build a school on a site that at one time
housed some of the deadliest toxins and chemicals known to man.
It has been tested, but not fully, and many of these sites, once
declared safe, have turned out not to be later on. Many things
remain unchecked at this one, and that gives me serious concerns
about student safety. What ticks me off even more is the smear
campaign they launched to try and get me and other concerned
people off their backs. The insinuation was that we are kinks
and therefore must have hidden agendas other than being worried
about kids getting hurt.
The original exposé was
by an asshole reporter with a local newspaper looking for a
sleaze story. He brushed aside
the thick folder of photographic evidence showing that the site
had many things unchecked and just kept digging for the sleaze
angle. My estimation of his character went to around minus 2000
at that moment.
The later
TV news feature was Komo 4, and I have to say that Liz (the
reporter) did a great job in revealing the real cause
for our fight, unlike the newspapers who have continually slanted
the story to make us look like trouble makers with no interest
other than self gain. I am pleased that it was a woman who blew
the whistle on the real story behind it all. I have great faith
in women. They can be a total pain in the ass at times, (as can
men) but when the crap hits the fan they make great gladiators
to have on your side. Sadly she may have come upon the story
too late. We shall see.
TDV: After
they showed your concerns they declare that you and your
wife run a ‘sex website’ out
of your home. Has there been any fall out from that exposure?
Gord: In the first place, that was basically slanderous. We have
a properly registered office several miles away, but we also
have a home office. Often we work until 10 pm answering emails
etc, and there is no way I am going to stay at the registered
office that many hours a day. The fact that we also use the same
place for location shoots does not mean we run the business from
home.
We were raided by
the cops just before the exposé by
the Sun newspaper and "before" Komo came to us. The
cops knew the Sun story was going out the next day and had to
pre-empt the breaking story so that they could answer the expected
calls from the raving monster loony brigade who would ring up
to claim they had seen kidnapped bound women being snatched from
the road, dragged into the house and tortured. They needed to
be able to say that they were on it and nothing nasty was going
on.
They were told to investigate a zoning law infringement, but
that wasn't bad at all. The cops were real decent and very respectful
and I have no complaint about their conduct. The next day they
went public with the statement that they found no evidence of
any illegal act, that we cooperated with them fully, that we
even showed them where everything was, and explained how it worked.
They then went on to say that we may have infringed a minor zoning
law, but it wasn't their place to make that judgment.
The most amazing thing was that the local people, who we expected
to mount a witch hunt, rallied around. This is a heavily religious
community, and we even have strongly religious people telling
us that although they may not agree with what we do for a living,
we totally have their support for our crusade and their heartfelt
sympathy in this difficult time. Just about everyone in the town
voiced their disgust at the smear tactic, and I have even had
ladies with kids coming up and shaking my hand and thanking me
for fighting for their kids, with statements that I should ride
it out and not leave. We were thinking about leaving to be sure.
But now, given the kindness of the people here we are having
second thoughts. To put it mildly, we are gobsmacked. This was
the last thing we expected.
TDV: Do you feel that mainstream media tries to sensationalize
BDSM activity? Do you notice changes in how BDSM is handled in
the media now as opposed to say five years ago?
Gord: Of course they sensationalize it. It sells, and they know
it. Humans are sexually curious animals. But most of the media
don't give a damn about the damage they do with bad reporting
as long as they get their front page scoop of fame.
Look at the recent disgusting crap that CSI New York did about
Forniphilia. That episode turned my stomach and it still makes
me real mad to see our bondage people depicted as irresponsible
raving homicidal maniacs who killed a women with ill advised
stunts for their own pleasure, and then left the woman naked
by the roadside instead of owning up to their stupidity. Worse
still, they stole my ideas because they are too brain dead to
work out their own storyline and turned something beautiful into
something horrific.
However, some media,
and film makers are trying to put out the lighter side. "Preaching to the perverted" was
a classic I thought. Humor and bondage go hand in hand I think,
and it
makes the difference.
So to answer your question, I don't think the BDSM scoop story
has that much front page punch anymore, unless they can link
it to some person who committed a sex offence. If they can somehow
indicate that this dude walked by a BDSM club ten years before
and happened to glance at the door, they will be all over trying
to say he was a member of the BDSM club and that it was full
off grungy sex predators. I have been told that my story would
not even have been news if I wasn't linked to the school fight.
TDV: What changes have you seen in the BDSM population from
when you first began to now? Do you see the changes as positive
or negative? Why?
Gord: I think the basic legalizing and outing of BDSM has been
a good thing. But I would not like to see it become an everyday
thing in the media. That would take away that special something.
At the same time I would say that any time you push something
completely underground with draconian laws, it gets nastier.
There is no control of the unethical types. Once something is
made illegal, you get busted no matter what level you are at,
so then the darker side can take over. A bit like the death penalty.
If you just killed a cop, you may as well go on killing to try
and fight your way out. You can only get fried once no matter
how many you kill in the attempt to get away with it.
If reasonable BDSM is accepted, then most people will not bother
to go the extra mile to that darker side and risk getting busted
if they can get their jollies playing at acceptable levels of
conduct.
TDV: Is there a difference in the customers on your site from
when it began to now?
Gord: Not that I can discern. Actually I still have many of the
original customers: they joined and never left.
Sadly, now and then
we get a letter from a relative saying that "Fred" or
whoever passed away. Hopefully Fred or whoever felt he was in
good company as he passed his final days browsing our zany website
bondage and went out with a smile and a good feeling. We also
just heard that one of our members was killed in Iraq. I hope
the moralist pricks who outed us to the news media remember,
he was a bondage kink, and he died fighting for their right to
be self righteous assholes.
Are there any other differences? Hard to tell. Generally I think
we get a lot of thinkers in our style of bondage. Some people
are okay with sex 'as is' and go all their lives without needing
to experiment with the 'perceived' dark side of BDSM. Others,
like us, just have to explore and see if there are other ways
and enjoy pushing their limits.
TDV: Any
thoughts about what the future holds for BDSM in general
and House
of Gord in particular?
Gord: I have no idea. Every day is a surprise these days. As
for BDSM, I think the door has been ripped off the closet and
no amount of nails will get it fixed back on. I also think it
will continue to creep into mainstream and probably take on new
forms as we evolve and new technologies allow us to experiment
with the great adventure of human sexuality, maybe going to heights
we probably cannot even conceive at this time.
Hopefully we won't get to the Barbarella stage before I'm long
gone. Having sex by popping a pill and touching fingers doesn't
do it for me somehow.
TDV: Do
you have anything else you’d
like to tell our readers?
Gord: I guess my message to your customers is this. Any self
respecting bondage player
who likes going to the limits probably questions their motives
at times and likely ponders the ethics
of where they are going and what they are getting out of it.
I would say this is normal in any consensual play, for either
side of the sub - dom divide. My view is that the day you stop
questioning yourself and trying to evaluate the outcome of the
adventure, you are heading for problems.
This particularly applies to potentially dangerous play. No
matter how many safety back-ups
I have, and how sure I am that I can do everything possible to
make the scene totally safe,
I sometimes scrap the idea because I cannot morally justify the
risks to the lady in my drive to produce even more erotic sensation
for myself and my fans.
As the saying goes. Life is not a journey to the grave with
the intention of arriving in a pretty and well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out, and loudly
proclaiming Wow! What a ride.
I guess when I roll up to the Pearly Gates, it will be because
I am basically the bionic man, otherwise I would have broken
apart long ago. Past life has required lots of repairs to this
abused body, including screwing it back together with nuts and
bolts. My arrival will probably be on a high powered crotch rocket,
in a full two wheel skid, dropping the bike as I crash through
the gates whilst performing multiple somersaults and then shouting,
" Who the fuck shut the damned gates? Didn't you know I was coming?"
Live long and prosper friends.
Gord |